Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya • ISSN 2075-7999
peer-reviewed • open access journal


Polezhaeva E.A. The complexity and inhomogeneity of self-monitoring phenomenon. Part 2

Full text in Russian: Полежаева Е.А. Комплексность и негомогенность феномена самомониторинга. Часть 2
Psychological Institute, Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia

About author
Suggested citation

In spite of various data about the phenomenon of self-monitoring the conclusions concerning its homogeneity are rather controversial. The aim of our research was to examine qualitative and quantitative changes in self-monitoring while its level grows, to reveal whether it is necessary to consider few discrete classes of self-monitoring, and to determine the inner reasons of this inhomogeneity and discontinuity of the phenomenon. The changes in self-monitoring correlation relationship structure were investigated.
The sample included 433 males aged 16 to 26. The main results are the following. Self-monitoring is a unitary psychological phenomenon, but includes two main discrete classes (types) which differ qualitatively and quantitatively by the structure of correlation relationships with personality traits. These two classes also show inhomogeneity and discontinuity since the specific inter-correlations show nonlinear nature the relationships with self-monitoring. Thus four subclasses may be regarded. The nonlinear nature of self-monitoring relationships is due to different contributions of the main self-monitoring factors (“Public self-presentation” and “Focus on others”).
The results of quantitative and qualitative analysis of self-monitoring and other psychological characteristics relationships (MANOVA and specific cases analysis) are presented in the part 2 of the paper.

Keywords: constellations, self-monitoring, self-monitoring structure, factors of self-monitoring, classes and subclasses of self-monitoring, inhomogeneity of the self-monitoring phenomenon

Cyrillic letters are transliterated according to BSI standards. The titles are given in author’s translation [in square brackets].

Ackerman P.
 A theory of adult intellectual development: process, personality, interests, and knowledge // Intelligence. 1996. Vol. 22. P. 227–57.

Ackerman P., Heggestad E. Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits // Psychol. Bull. 1997. Vol. 121. P. 218–45.

Anan'ev B.G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Humanbeing as a subject of cognition]. Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU, 1969. 288 s. [in Russian]

Anderson L., Tolson J. Group members' self-monitoring as a possible neutralizer of leadership // Small Group Behavior. 1989. Vol. 20. P. 24–36.

Anderson L., Tolson J. Leaders' upward influence in the organization: Replication and extensions of the Pelz effect to include group support and self-monitoring // Small Group Research. 1991. Vol. 22. P. 59–75.

Cronshaw S., Ellis R. A process investigation of self-monitoring and leader emergence // Small Group Research. 1991. Vol. 22. P. 403–420.

Dawis R., Lofquist L. A Psychological Theory of Work Adjustment. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press. 1984. 245 p.

DeBono K., Packer M. The effects of advertising appeal on perceptions of product quality // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1991. Vol. 17. P. 194–200.

Fandt P., Farris G. The management of information and impressions: When employees behave opportunistically // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1990. Vol. 43. P. 140–158.

Gangestad S., Snyder M. “To carve nature at its joints”: On the existence of discrete classes in personality // Psychological Review. 1985. Vol. 92. P. 317–349.

Gangestad S., Snyder M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal // Psychological Bulletin. 2000. Vol. 126. P. 530–555.

Jenkins J. Self-monitoring and turnover: The impact of personality on intentions to leave // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1993. Vol. 36. P. 364–396.

Kilduff M. The friendship network as a decision-making resource: Dispositional moderators of social influences on organization choice // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992. Vol. 62. P. 168–180.

Kilduff M., Day D. Do chameleons get ahead? The effects of self-monitoring on managerial careers // Academy of Management Journal. 1994. Vol. 37. P. 1047–1060.

Lubinski D. Scientific and Social significance of assessing individual differences: “Sinking shafts at a few critical points” // Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2000. Vol. 51. P. 405–444.

Miller M., Thayer J. On the existence of discrete classes in personality: Is self-monitoring the correct joint to carve? // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989. Vol. 57. P. 143–155.

Rubinstein S.L. Osnovy obshchei psikhologii [The foundations of general psychology]: v 2 t. M.: Pedagogika, 1989. 720 s. [in Russian]

Shavitt S., Lowrey T., Han S.-P. Attitude functions in advertising: The interactive role of products and self-monitoring // Journal of Consumer Psychology. 1992. Vol. 1. P. 337–364.

Snow R. The concept of aptitude // R.Snow, D.Wiley (Eds.). Improving Inquiry in the Social Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum, 1991. P. 249–84

Snyder M. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1974. Vol. 30. P. 526–537.

Snyder M. Public appearance / private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York, 1987.

Snyder M., Gangestad S. On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986. Vol. 51. P. 125–139.

Accepted 4 April  2009. Date of publication: 26 August 2009.

About author

Polezhaeva Ekaterina A. M.Sci., Ph.D. Student, Psychological Institute, Russian Academy of Education, ul. Mokhovaya 9, str. 4, 125009 Moscow, Russia.
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Suggested citation

APA Style
Polezhaeva, E. A. (2009). The complexity and inhomogeneity of self-monitoring phenomenon. Part 2. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 4(6). Retrieved from [in Russian, abstr. in English].

Polezhaeva, E. A. (2009). The complexity and inhomogeneity of self-monitoring phenomenon. Part 1. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 3(5). Retrieved from [in Russian, abstr. in English].

Russian State Standard GOST P 7.0.5-2008

Polezhaeva E.A. The complexity and inhomogeneity of self-monitoring phenomenon. Part 2 [Electronic resource] // Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2009. N 4(6). URL: (date of access: [in Russian, abstr. in English]

Polezhaeva E.A. The complexity and inhomogeneity of self-monitoring phenomenon. Part 1 [Electronic resource] // Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2009. N 3(5). URL: (date of access: [in Russian, abstr. in English]

Part 1 >>

Back to top >>